The EU Reporter’s recent article, “A pragmatic path to ending smoking in Europe”, emphasises the scientific consensus: not all nicotine products carry the same risk.
The piece advocates for regulatory differentiation based on product risk profiles, encouraging the use of safer alternatives like nicotine pouches, which eliminate combustion and significantly reduce harm. As Europe revises its tobacco policies, this educational argument for harm reduction offers a rational and life-saving framework grounded in public health science.
THR Topics
Popular Posts
Quick Links
Related Posts
Time to support Filipino vape law, not relitigate it
Time to support Filipino vape law, not relitigate it
“Any concerns about youth vaping are well covered in last year’s landmark vape law. The Philippines has more than enough…
Greens’ Plan To Legalise Nicotine Vapes Lauded
Greens’ Plan To Legalise Nicotine Vapes Lauded
Cate Faehrmann, MP of the NSW Greens, Australia announced a plan to legalise nicotine vapes for people over the age…
Taiwan Vaping Ban Disappointing For Its Many Smokers
Taiwan Vaping Ban Disappointing For Its Many Smokers
“Raising the legal age for buying cigarettes to 20 is a good move, but effectively banning e-cigarettes is disappointing from…
Alcohol Harm Reduction
More about
Alcohol Harm Reduction
Drug Harm Reduction
More about
